Trump trial: Jury deliberates, asks to rehear testimony

NEW YORK –

The jury in Donald Trump’s hush cash trial ended its first day of deliberations and not using a verdict Wednesday however requested to rehear testimony from key witnesses concerning the alleged hush cash scheme on the coronary heart of the history-making case.

The 12-person jury was despatched dwelling round 4 p.m. after about four-and-a-half hours of deliberations. The method is to renew Thursday, when jurors are anticipated to rehear the requested testimony and a minimum of a part of the decide’s authorized directions meant to information them on the legislation.

The notes despatched to the decide with the requests had been the primary burst of communication with the court docket after the panel of seven males and 5 ladies was despatched to a non-public room simply earlier than 11:30 a.m. to start weighing a verdict.

“It isn’t my accountability to guage the proof right here. It’s yours,” Choose Juan M. Merchan informed jurors earlier within the day earlier than dispatching them to start deliberations. He additionally reminded them of their vow through the choice course of to guage the case pretty and impartially.

It is unclear how lengthy the deliberations will final. A responsible verdict would ship a surprising authorized reckoning for the presumptive Republican presidential nominee as he seeks to reclaim the White Home whereas an an acquittal would symbolize a serious win for Trump and embolden him on the marketing campaign path. Since verdicts should be unanimous, it is also potential that the case ends in a mistrial if the jury can not attain a consensus after days of deliberations.

Trump struck a pessimistic tone after leaving the courtroom following an hourlong studying of jury directions, repeating his assertions of a “very unfair trial” and saying: “Mom Teresa couldn’t beat these expenses, however we’ll see. We’ll see how we do.”

Former President Donald Trump provides remarks after exiting the courtroom throughout his trial at a Manhattan Legal court docket on Tuesday, Could 14, 2024, in New York. (Michael M. Santiago/Pool Photograph through AP)

He remained contained in the courthouse throughout deliberations, the place he posted on his social media community complaints concerning the trial and quoted authorized and political commentators who view the case in his favor. In a single all-capital-letters publish, he proclaimed that he did not even “know what the costs are on this rigged case,” although he was current within the courtroom because the decide detailed them to jurors.

He didn’t testify in his personal defence, one thing the decide informed jurors they might not keep in mind.

Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying enterprise information at his firm in reference to an alleged scheme to cover doubtlessly embarrassing tales about him throughout his 2016 Republican presidential election marketing campaign.

The cost, a felony, arises from reimbursements paid to then-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen after he made a US$130,000 hush cash cost to porn actor Stormy Daniels to silence her claims of that the 2 had intercourse in 2006. Trump is accused of misrepresenting Cohen’s reimbursements as authorized bills to cover that they had been tied to a hush cash cost.

Trump has pleaded not responsible and contends the Cohen funds had been for authentic authorized companies. He has additionally denied the alleged extramarital sexual encounter with Daniels.

To convict Trump, the jury must discover unanimously that he created a fraudulent entry in his firm’s information, or brought about another person to take action, and that he did so with the intent of committing or concealing one other crime.

The crime prosecutors say Trump dedicated or hid is a violation of a New York election legislation making it unlawful for 2 or extra conspirators “to advertise or stop the election of any individual to a public workplace by illegal means.”

Whereas the jury should unanimously agree that one thing illegal was finished to advertise Trump’s election marketing campaign, they don’t must be unanimous on what that illegal factor was.

The jurors — a various cross-section of Manhattan residents {and professional} backgrounds — typically appeared riveted by testimony within the trial, together with from Cohen and Daniels. Many took notes and watched intently as witnesses answered questions from Manhattan prosecutors and Trump’s legal professionals.

Jurors began deliberating after a marathon day of closing arguments wherein a prosecutor spoke for greater than 5 hours, underscoring the burden the district lawyer’s workplace faces in needing to determine Trump’s guilt past an affordable doubt.

Former U.S. president Donald Trump attends the closing arguments within the Trump Group civil fraud trial at New York State Supreme Courtroom within the Manhattan borough of New York, Jan. 11, 2024. (Shannon Stapleton/Pool Photograph through AP, File)

The Trump staff needn’t set up his innocence to keep away from a conviction however should as a substitute financial institution on a minimum of one juror discovering that prosecutors haven’t sufficiently proved their case.

Whereas giving the jury directions within the legislation Wednesday morning, Merchan supplied some steering on components the panel can use to evaluate witness testimony, together with its plausibility, its consistency with different testimony, the witness’ method on the stand and whether or not the individual has a motive to lie.

However, the decide stated, “there is no such thing as a explicit method for evaluating the truthfulness and accuracy of one other individual’s assertion.”

The rules he outlined are customary however maybe all of the extra related after Trump’s defence leaned closely on questioning the credibility of key prosecution witnesses, together with Cohen.

Jurors requested within the afternoon to rehear a minimum of a part of these directions. In addition they requested to revisit choose key episodes within the trial, although it was not clear why.

The requests lined testimony from Cohen and former Nationwide Enquirer writer David Pecker about an August 2015 assembly with Trump at Trump Tower the place the tabloid boss pledged to be the “eyes and ears” of his fledgling presidential marketing campaign.

Pecker testified that the plan included figuring out doubtlessly damaging tales about Trump in order that they may very well be squashed earlier than being revealed. That, prosecutors say, was the start of the catch-and-kill scheme on the coronary heart of the case.

Jurors additionally need to hear Pecker’s account of a telephone name he stated he obtained from Trump wherein they mentioned a rumor that one other outlet had supplied to purchase former Playboy mannequin Karen McDougal’s story alleging that she had a yearlong affair with Trump within the mid-2000s. Trump has denied the affair.

Pecker testified that Trump informed him, “Karen is a pleasant woman” and requested, “What do you assume I ought to do?” Pecker stated he replied: “I feel you can purchase the story and take it off the market.” He added that Trump informed him he doesn’t purchase tales as a result of they all the time get out and that Cohen could be in contact.

The writer stated he got here away from the dialog pondering Trump was conscious of the specifics of McDougal’s claims. Pecker stated he believed the story was true and would have been embarrassing to Trump and his marketing campaign if it had been made public.

The Nationwide Enquirer’s guardian firm, American Media Inc., finally paid McDougal $150,000 for the rights to her story in an settlement that additionally included writing and different alternatives with its health journal and different publications.

The fourth merchandise jurors requested is Pecker’s testimony about his determination in October 2016 to again out of an settlement to promote the rights to McDougal’s story to Trump by an organization Cohen had established for the transaction. Such an settlement is named an “project of rights.”

“I referred to as Michael Cohen, and I stated to him that the settlement, the project deal, is off. I’m not going ahead. It’s a unhealthy concept, and I need you to tear up the settlement,” Pecker testified. “He was very, very, offended. Very upset. Screaming, principally, at me.”

Pecker testified that he reiterated to Cohen that he wasn’t going ahead with the settlement.

He stated that Cohen informed him: “The boss goes to be very offended at you.”