Lawmakers advance measure opening Wyoming to possible nuclear fuel waste storage

Lawmakers advance measure opening Wyoming to possible nuclear fuel waste storage

by Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile

With a handful of dissenting votes, a legislative panel has superior a draft measure that proponents say merely gives the chance to debate altering Wyoming statutes to allow non permanent storage of high-level radioactive gasoline waste from nuclear energy crops.

The Minerals, Enterprise and Financial Growth Committee on Tuesday voted in favor of the draft invoice Used nuclear gasoline storage-amendments, which implies the committee will sponsor the measure when the total Legislature convenes in January. 

Committee Co-chairman Rep. Donald Burkhart Jr. (R-Rawlins), a longtime proponent of bringing nuclear gasoline waste into the state, first rolled out the potential for brand new laws relating to the matter in July, however neither he nor the committee shared a draft of the proposed laws till weeks earlier than the October assembly. The invoice draft would amend previous laws principally to align current state statute with up to date language relating to industrial nuclear waste storage with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Fee and the Division of Power, Burkhart mentioned.

“This isn’t a dialogue of why or why to not have this,” Burkhart mentioned on the onset of the dialogue, including that the committee took up the problem on the request of the Legislature’s Regulatory Discount Process Pressure. “That is merely to amend the present statute.”

A spent nuclear gasoline cask is moved on the Surry Energy Station nuclear plant in Virginia in 2007. (Nuclear Regulatory Fee/FlickrCommons)

Burkhart was clear in July when he notified his fellow committee members of the pending proposal in draft type — which he shared with them, however not with the general public — that nuclear storage held monetary promise. The outlook for Wyoming’s fossil fuel-dependent finances is trending downward, and the state might reap greater than $4 billion a 12 months from nuclear waste storage, “simply to allow us to hold it right here in Wyoming,” he mentioned then.

Additionally in July, Burkhart mentioned he’d not too long ago visited with a personal landowner in Fremont County who, as previously, is fascinated by promoting land for such a storage facility. The land buy would value an estimated $2 million, Burkhart had mentioned, and it could value about $400 million to construct the ability. “None of which might come from the state,” he mentioned. “It might all come from non-public enterprise.”

Burkhart didn’t focus on such particulars on Tuesday and mentioned “present statutes in Wyoming battle with the [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] rules, and we have to deliver them in line.”

The will to open Wyoming to the nation’s spent nuclear energy plant gasoline, nevertheless, is nothing new. Then-Gov. Mike Sullivan, after months of statewide debate, vetoed a measure in 1992 that will have opened the state to storing the waste. Although the Legislature has since up to date statutes to accommodate spent nuclear gasoline waste from nuclear energy crops within the state, there stays a statute prohibiting a industrial high-level radioactive waste facility until the federal authorities establishes a everlasting repository. 

The draft measure wouldn’t change that statute, but opponents mentioned it opens the door to an unpopular concept that Wyoming — in addition to Texas, Nevada and different states — have rejected many occasions.

Greater than 100 individuals attended the Nuclear Regulatory Fee’s public info classes Nov. 7, 2023, in Kemmerer. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“We’re a bit alarmed on the velocity at which this difficulty, particularly, has come about,” Wyoming Outside Council Govt Director Carl Fisher advised the committee. “Certainly one of our issues about this laws is the shortage of public engagement the place we’re sort of seeking to federal businesses to convene [discussion on] this, however [Wyoming is] not convening native public processes round impacts on communities.

“This implies our communities, the tourism we’re reliant upon, our wildlife, our water, our wildlands, might be subjected to a poisonous legacy that stems from a rush determination,” Fisher added.

Jill Morrison, who lobbied towards related measures previously, famous that the draft invoice requires solely 30 days’ discover to the general public earlier than graduation of building for such a facility.

“Coping with high-level radioactive waste is just not a easy matter,” Morrison advised the committee. “And it’s been rejected by the state of Wyoming — by the general public — 3 times. I believe the individuals of this state [should] get a chance to weigh in on one thing like this.” 

Earlier within the day, the committee heard testimony from Nuclear Regulatory Fee allowing officers who mentioned they totally vet such services, together with a number of alternatives for public enter in addition to an opportunity to protest a storage web site proposal. Sen. Ed Cooper (R-Ten Sleep) mentioned the NRC’s assurance ought to guarantee a full environmental evaluate and public enter course of.

A barrel of radioactive waste is seen by way of a catwalk on the Smith Ranch-Highland in-situ uranium mine in Wyoming. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“I believe simply saying that we completely don’t need used gasoline storage in Wyoming — to only say that could be very close-minded,” Cooper mentioned. “I’m unsure that we do need it in Wyoming, and that’s not what this invoice is doing. It’s merely permitting the dialogue to maneuver ahead with the definitions assembly the NRC and the [Department of Energy] language.”

Former Senate President Eli Bebout, a longtime proponent of storing spent nuclear gasoline waste in Wyoming, additionally spoke in favor of the measure “so we are able to actually have a look at this factor in depth,” he mentioned.

“Nuclear energy has made an enormous comeback,” mentioned Bebout, who lives in Fremont County. “I’ve been a proponent of nuclear energy for 25 or 30 years. It’s one of many final issues left, I believe, to essentially assist this example we have now in America.”

Federal efforts to determine a everlasting storage facility for high-level radioactive waste are presently led by the Division of Power by way of its consent-based siting program — a course of for communities to determine broad native help for internet hosting such a facility. 

“There isn’t a everlasting repository and actually no motion in the direction of one,” NRC spokesman David McIntyre advised WyoFile in July.


This text was initially revealed by WyoFile and is republished right here with permission. WyoFile is an impartial nonprofit information group centered on Wyoming individuals, locations and coverage.